Pojam “ugovor o javnoj nabavi” u pravu Europske unije s posebnim osvrtom na povezane iznimke od primjene zakonodavstva o javnoj nabavi

Danijel Stanković, mag. iur., LL.M. Finance (Institute for Law and Finance, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main); LL.M. de droit français et de droit européen (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), pravnik lingvist na Sudu Europske unije, TB/16LB0022, Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg; danijel.stankovic@curia.europa.eu;  ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0551-7394

*Autor u ovom članku iznosi svoje vlastite stavove koji ni na koji način ne predstavljaju službeno stajalište Suda EU-a na kojem trenutačno radi.

Sažetak
Tko je i pod kojim uvjetima dužan provesti postupak javne nabave ponajprije ovisi o kvalifikaciji određenog pravnog odnosa kao ugovora o javnoj nabavi. Za takvu se kvalifikaciju moraju ispuniti određene pretpostavke, inače nije riječ o ugovoru o javnoj nabavi. U radu se analiziraju bitna obilježja takvog ugovora kako ih Sud Europske unije tumači u svojoj praksi i novo pravno uređenje iz 2014., koje u nekim aspektima (osobito u pogledu tzv. nabave in house, ugovorne suradnje javnih naručitelja i prijenosa nadležnosti između javnih tijela) izričito odstupa od te prakse.

Ključne riječi: javna nabava; ugovor o javnoj nabavi; nabava in house; ugovorna suradnja javnih naručitelja; prijenos ovlasti i odgovornosti za izvršavanje javnih zadaća

Hrčak ID: 195560

Puni tekst: https://hrcak.srce.hr/195560

Stranice: 121 - 155

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

The Notion of “Public Contract” in EU Law and Related Exceptions to the Applicability of Public Procurement Legislation

Danijel Stanković, mag. iur., LL.M. Finance (Institute for Law and Finance, Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main); LL.M. de droit français et de droit européen (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne), Lawyer-linguist, Court of Justice of the European Union, TB/16LB0022, Rue du Fort Niedergrünewald, L-2925 Luxembourg; danijel.stankovic@curia.europa.eu; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0551-7394 

* The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and in no way represent the official position of the Court of Justice of the EU where the author works.

Summary
The subject-matter of this paper is the notion of “public contract” in EU law as functionally interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union, as well as related exceptions to the applicability of the 2014 public procurement legislation package, with particular regard to in-house awards, cooperation between contracting authorities and transfers of powers.
The analysis follows each of the five main elements of a public contract relating to (i) the existence of a contract, (ii) pecuniary interest, (iii) written form, (iv) the parties being two legally distinct persons and (v) the object being the provision of works, supplies or services.
The main conclusion of the research is that the broad and functional interpretation of each of the main requirements by the CJEU, together with a strict interpretation of the available exceptions to those requirements, aims at preventing circumventions of the EU procurement rules. However, due to that approach, various forms of public-public cooperation were for a long time collateral casualties. The 2014 legislative framework provides additional clarity and legal certainty in that respect, but there are still certain situations which do not appear to be covered, which will require interpretation by the CJEU in the future.

Keywords: public procurement; public contract; in house award; cooperation between contracting authorities; transfer of powers and responsibilities for the performance of public tasks

Hrčak ID: 195560

Full text: https://hrcak.srce.hr/195560

Pages: 121 - 155