JELENA ARAMBAŠIĆ:
Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu
JELENA ARAMBAŠIĆ

Ovrha na virtualnim valutama

Jelena Arambašić, mag. iur., javnobilježnički prisjednik, doktorandica Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagrebačka 7, 31000 Osijek; jarambasic1@yahoo.com; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-0294

Sažetak

Domaće pozitivnopravno uređenje opisuje virtualne valute podvrstom virtualne imovine. Budući da se smatraju imovinom te su prenosive i imaju novčanu protuvrijednost, oportuno je istražiti jesu li sposobne biti predmet ovrhe. Kako Ovršni zakon ne regulira ovrhu na virtualnim valutama, u radu se raspravlja mogu li se virtualne valute u kontekstu ovršnog postupka podvesti pod kategoriju drugih imovinskih odnosno materijalnih prava. Također se pobliže razmatraju potencijalni problemi koji se mogu pojaviti u ovršnim radnjama pljenidbe i unovčenja s obzirom na glavne karakteristike virtualnih valuta. Zaključuje se kako zbog ovrhe na virtualnim valutama nije potrebno novelirati Ovršni zakon, već adaptirati ovršne radnje u skladu s karakteristikama virtualnih valuta.

Ključne riječi

virtualne valute; bitcoin; ovrha na virtualnim valutama; ovrha na drugim imovinskim odnosno materijalnim pravima

Doi: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.74.1.05

Hrčak ID: 316384

URI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/316384

Stranice: 125-151

Enforcement on Cryptocurrency

Jelena Arambašić, LL. M., notary public associate, doctoral student (Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb), Zagrebačka 7, 31000 Osijek; jarambasic1@yahoo.com; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8604-0294

Summary

The domestic legal framework describes virtual currencies as a subtype of virtual assets. Since they are considered assets, are transferable, and have monetary value, it is necessary to explore whether they are suitable to be considered as subjects of enforcement. As the Enforcement Act does not regulate the enforcement of virtual currencies, the question arises as to whether virtual currencies can be classified under “other property or material rights” in the context of enforcement proceedings. Potential issues that may arise in enforcement actions of seizure and realization are also closely examined in relation to the key characteristics of virtual currencies. It is concluded that there is no need to amend the Enforcement Act for enforcement on virtual currencies but rather to adapt enforcement actions in accordance with the characteristics of virtual currencies, albeit cautiously.

Keywords: cryptocurrency; bitcoin; enforcement on cryptocurrency; enforcement on other property or material rights

Doi: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.74.1.05

Hrčak ID: 316384

URI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/316384

Pages: 125-151