DUBRAVKA HRABAR:
Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu
Dubravka Hrabar: Prava djece pred suvremenim izazovima – djeca kao cilj ili kao sredstvo?

Prava djece pred suvremenim izazovima – djeca kao cilj ili kao sredstvo?

Dr. sc. Dubravka Hrabar, profesorica Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, 10000 Zagreb; dubravka.hrabar@pravo.unizg.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4103-8190

Sažetak

Ostvarenje djetetovih prava u rukama je odraslih, osobito njegovih roditelja. Na temeljima Konvencije o pravima djeteta izrastao je sustav zaštite djece stavljene u središte odnosa odrasli – djeca (tzv. pedocentrizam) koji zbog prirodne ovisnosti djece o odraslima može biti izvrgnut svojoj suprotnosti, a to je iskorištavanje djece za ostvarenje želja i ideja odraslih. Takav preokret značio bi vraćanje na vremena kad su djeca bila objekt društvenih i obiteljskih odnosa. Djetinjstvo je doba u kojemu se formira budućnost djeteta te ono iziskuje posebnu pozornost. U određenom smislu vrhunski pravni pojam – najbolji interes djeteta – kako ga relativno apstraktno definira Konvencija o pravima djeteta biva predmetom zloporabe u svim onim situacijama kad se na individualnoj razini iza njega skrivaju želje odraslih, bez obzira na to je li riječ o roditeljima ili organiziranim (političkim) skupinama. Od doba donošenja Konvencije o pravima djeteta do danas pojavljuju se ozbiljne zamjerke od strane (pravnih) teoretičara koji uočavaju društvena ponašanja koja Konvencija nije predvidjela, a danas žive i tako štete djeci. Osobito štetnom smatra se rodna ideologija koja niječe različita prava djeteta – od prava na identitet do prava na zdravlje. Dodaju li se tomu raznovrsni štetni utjecaji kao što je ovisnost o društvenim mrežama i internetu, postavlja se pitanje nalaze li se u postmodernom dobu prava djece pred vlastitim izumiranjem. Čini se da je krajnji čas da se čovječanstvo vrati nekoliko desetljeća unazad i prava djece, a ne odraslih stavi u središte zapodjenuvši otvorenu bitku protiv nasrtaja na djetinjstvo, djecu i njihova prava.

Ključne riječi: prava djece, Konvencija o pravima djeteta, rodna ideologija

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.74.2.01

Hrčak ID: 319105

URI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/319105

Stranice: 155-188

Children’s Rights in Front of Contemporary Challenges – Children as a Goal or as a Means?

Dubravka Hrabar, Ph. D., Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Trg Republike Hrvatske 14, 10000 Zagreb; dubravka.hrabar@pravo.unizg.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4103-8190

Summary

Childhood is a very limited period of one’s life, but at the same time crucial for transforming a child into an adult. Many children’s rights allow the children to realize the rights in their childhood, far away from different influences present in the world of adults, whose influences might put the children in peril. Social analysis shows that during the last two decades children live in a kind of whirlpool, weighted by desires of their parents or third persons, as well as the social influences that neglect a child’s needs. The intention of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) was to protect children in all situations, giving to adults, especially parents, the means to realize all the different children’s rights. The CRC has constructed a new paradigm of putting the child in the middle (so called pedocentrism) precisely because children are dependent on adults. The adults’ role in a child’s life is enormously important because of the child’s dependence on them. However, they may misuse it by using children for the fulfilment of their wishes and ideas. Such a change of approach puts children in the position of being an object in social and familial relations. Originally devised as the highest principle in dealing with a child – the best interest of the child – seems to be abused in some situations nowadays. This happens when adults’ desires hide behind children’s interests regardless of whether this might be attributed to the parents, activists or political groups. Since the time when the CRC was adopted until today, some serious objections have appeared, mostly put forward by legal theorists, warning that the CRC did not foresee various social behaviours that harm children today. According to them children’s rights are characterised by a lack of sufficient scope, autonomous realization by children or a coherent philosophy. Furthermore, it is claimed that it is unnecessary to catalogue children’s rights, that there is a need for better protection. It is also stated that the CRC has an anti-family orientation, it is a reflection of the neocolonialism of the West, and that “childism” has replaced parental authority. This article discusses these criticisms and warns of a new devastating phenomenon, increasingly dangerous for children – gender ideology. This “lifestyle”, if applied to children directly, annuls the child’s right to identity and health. The post-modern era seems to destroy the natural way of living, founded on the idea of unlimited liberty without responsibility. Children’s lives are imperilled by various Internet and social networks which have creeped in children’s everyday life. There is no doubt whatsoever that particular children’s rights are facing extinction. Apparently, there is a constantly growing need to protect children from dangerous ideas presented by adults. If this is not done, children will again become the object instead the subject of children’s rights.

Keywords: children’s rights; Convention on the Rights of the Child; gender ideology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.74.2.01

Hrčak ID: 319105

URI: https://hrcak.srce.hr/319105

Pages: 155-188