Igor Martinović: “Problematika tajnosti i

transparentnosti prethodnog kaznenog

postupka nakon zakonskih novela iz

2024. – analiza de lege lata i smjernice de

lege ferenda”

Dr.      sc.       Igor Martinović,    profesor Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci, Hahlić 6, 51 000 Rijeka; igor.martinovic@pravri.uniri.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7648-2443

Sažetak
Rad analizira pravni okvir “curenja informacija” iz prethodnog kaznenog postupka nakon novela Kaznenog zakona i Zakona o kaznenom postupku iz 2024. Nakon prikaza povijesnog razvoja problematike tajnosti i nejavnosti u prethodnom postupku, provodi se de lege lata analiza kaznenog djela povrede tajnosti postupka (čl. 307. Kaznenog zakona). U središnjem dijelu rada, daje se tumačenje novog kaznenog djela neovlaštenog otkrivanja sadržaja izvidne ili dokazne radnje (čl. 307.a KZ-a), s naglaskom na doktrinarno i praktično sporna pitanja. U zaključku se nastoji ponuditi širi konceptualni okvir za promišljanje o problematici tajnosti i nejavnosti u prethodnom postupku, uz naznake mogućih smjerova razvoja de lege ferenda.

Ključne riječi: tajnost; nejavnost; prethodni kazneni postupak; curenje informacija; neovlašteno otkrivanje sadržaja izvidne ili dokazne radnje

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.75.5.1  

Hrčak ID: 344575

URI:  https://hrcak.srce.hr/344575

Stranice: 681-711

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Issues of Secrecy and Transparency in Pre-Trial Criminal Proceedings After the 2024 Legislative Amendments – A de lege lata Analysis and de lege ferenda Guidelines

Igor Martinović, Ph. D., Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Rijeka, Hahlić 6, 51 000 Rijeka; igor.martinovic@pravri.uniri.hr; ORCID ID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7648-2443

Summary

Money and crime are closely interconnected. This connection can be viewed from several important perspectives: sociological, economic, criminological, and even political. The aim of this paper is to shed light on the economic and criminological aspects of these two categories and to deepen the understanding of how money influences crime and vice versa. This discussion may serve as a starting point for further debate on the “cost of crime” in Croatian society – an issue currently underestimated within the Croatian academic sphere. Furthermore, an individual’s economic status is a significant etiological factor in the commission of certain types of crime, and as such, it must be studied holistically—not solely through criminological frameworks, but also through an economic lens, especially considering that the quality of criminal justice policy is inseparable from the material resources allocated to it. In this context, the authors will also address the recent debate on universal basic income, which could potentially have a significant impact on crime prevention as well as overall societal well-being. The interwoven economic and criminological perspectives in the discourse on crime are not commonly explored in the Croatian academic landscape, and therefore, the authors hope that this paper will encourage a multidisciplinary approach to the study of crime in the Republic of Croatia.

Key words:  money; crime; universal basic income; economics of crime

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/zpfz.75.5.1  

Hrčak ID: 344575

URI:  https://hrcak.srce.hr/344575

Pages: 681-711